New rockfish limits are coming, and it isn’t pretty.  Canary Rockfish, in particular, will have a limit of ONE fish, for both inshore and deep water fisheries.  Here’s a summary with the changes in bold type:

• No seasonal depth restriction

• General marine bag limit:
  • January – June:  4 fish bag limit
    • 1 fish sub-bag of canary rockfish
  • July- December:  5 fish bag limit
    • 1 fish sub-bag of canary rockfish
    • 1 fish sub-bag of cabezon
• Longleader bag limit:  10 fish with a 1 fish sub-bag of canary rockfish
• Lingod bag limit:  2-fish
• Sablefish bag limit: 10 fish
• Flatfish bag limit: 25 fish
• Surfperch bag limit: 15 fish
• Yelloweye and quillback rockfish remain prohibited  

The one-fish limit of canary rockfish is really painful, especially for the deep-water long leader fishery where canaries are among the most common species taken.  

Although not yet finalized, these are the regulations recommended by ODFW staff.  They will be presented to the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission for adoption at a December 13 meeting in Salem.  Public comments will be accepted, but history suggests it’s pretty much a done deal.   If you want to comment, here’s the link  https://www.dfw.state.or.us/agency/commission/  

P.S.  In very simplified terms, there are quotas for various rockfish species.  ODFW is tasked with making sure the actual sport catches stay below the allowable quotas, which is why you encounter fish checkers at the dock.   It’s a difficult balancing act and there’s never enough data.  They’re painfully aware of how bag limits affect us, and they do a good job.  That said, bag limit reductions like this really hurt!

The article was courtesy of Charles Loos from his newsletter. If you would like to subscribe to his newsletter, please go to https://www.boatwebinar.com/3afumx1nn0

Kelp forests have declined across the world and governments, organizations and businesses are mounting ambitious efforts to protect and restore 9 million acres of kelp globally by 2040.

Still, the dilemma remains: is kelp restoration even feasible, given the billions of purple urchins feasting on the seaweed and eradicating it from the ocean?

“That is the question that keeps me up at night,” said Tristin McHugh, the Nature Conservancy kelp project director. “But what’s the alternative? Do we let this ecosystem lapse into something that can be irreparable? I’ve seen the success stories from around the world. When a culture acknowledges that an ecosystem is worth saving, they will do it. This might be our chance.”

Read more at oregonlive.com

The recovery of Pacific bluefin tuna has achieved a major milestone—the species exceeded international targets a decade ahead of schedule. The rebuilding of Pacific bluefin tuna reflects a fisheries management success. International organizations cooperated across the Pacific to reverse decades of overfishing for the prized species.

The International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-Like Species in the North Pacific Ocean (ISC), including NOAA Fisheries researchers, provided scientific expertise to inform conservation measures. The Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) adopted these measures.

The ISC recently finalized the new stock assessment at the annual meeting in Victoria, Canada. The assessment confirmed that the stock reached the second rebuilding target in 2021. If the current management measures persist, the population growth is expected to continue growing. 

Read more at noaa.gov

A recent report out of Oregon State University paints a picture of how ocean oxygen levels have decreased in the Pacific Northwest over the years.

The report found near-bottom levels of dissolved oxygen in the waters off of Washington, Oregon and Northern California in 2021. JPR’s Roman Battaglia talked to Jack Barth, professor of oceanography at OSU, about his report and what these low oxygen levels mean for marine life.

Roman Battaglia: One thing I noticed in this study was that the levels seem pretty different in different parts of the coast. For example, in northern California and the southern Oregon coast, the oxygen levels seem much higher than they are in southern Washington and the northern Oregon coast. But why is there so much variability?

Jack Barth: That was the second big outcome of the paper, is that there really are regional differences. And importantly, we can explain them by oceanographic processes. So that higher oxygen level off southern Oregon, that’s because the continental shelf is relatively narrow. So it can flush water on and off pretty effectively from the deep ocean and flush out that low oxygen water so it stays high. And it looks like a pretty good area for fisheries. As you get into the wider continental shelves off central Oregon and Washington, the water sticks around longer; it doesn’t get flushed off as effectively. So that keeps those low oxygen waters near the bottom on those wider shelves.

Battaglia: Have we determined the cause of why these low oxygen levels are happening, or why the oxygen levels are getting lower? It seems like climate change is playing a factor in that?

Read more on opb.org